Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anmol Mehta's avatar

Great detailed post Sam fun hand ! Loved the footnote 28 in weighing combos than counting combos which we all are guilty of specially in spots like these !

Zachary Neugut's avatar

I really disagree with this play (and therefore the 30th footnote as well), because the logic is inconsistent.

Pre-flop is obviously fine, and on the flop, betting at some frequency is fine (although I don't think you're appreciating how often you should be checking 4-way). At these stakes, some people protection raise the flop vs. a 1/3rd bet with a hand like JT, but that's definitely not a good play to do often, so he is already starting to rep a good ten or a flopped set for value (and on T73 rainbow there should be no 2-pair in his range). The bluffs are already hard to find because there is no flush draw available, people don't often start turning 7x/3x into bluffs on the flop in low stakes (even though I think it would be a great play, Mr. Greenwood is playing way higher stakes than a $15 buyin to assume this is a likely bluff combo), and if he has a hand like 98 or a lower equity bluff why not just call in position with 2 people left to act. The reason you say you "Don’t like this at all" on the flop is because if he has a set he is going to go for your stack, if he has a mergy hand like JT he won't go 3 streets on it, and he is probably rarely bluffing and even if he is bluffing he is probably going to put you to the test on future streets covering you. His sets will raise at 90%-100% frequency on this flop, while he technically has more bluff combos, what frequency are they raising? 10%? 5%? 0%?

On the turn, you are already reading him (probably correctly) super strong, even though the bet size seems innocuous to me. This is because on the flop maybe he has a merge Tx you are ahead of, but on the turn even at these stakes he will almost never bet a Tx hand, so you lost part of his range you are beating. So assuming he isn't an animal calling T7s on the button preflop which he doesn't sound like the type, you are at best chopping with value at this point.

Which brings us to the river when you fold on a "scary card". Why is this card so scary, for the super low frequency backdoor flushes/QJ he raises flop with, or the super low frequency AT that barrels turn with? For all intents and purposes, not only is the river a blank, but its actually a good card for you, insofar that the turn and river are both "scare cards", so if he was spazz bluffing the flop, this is one of the most likely runouts he would continue tripling off a low equity bluff on, trying to get you to fold Tx by the river.

So I don't mind folding river at all depending what your logic is. But if you want to make a big river exploit and fold, you should definitely make an even bigger turn exploit and fold then, and possibly even make an insane hero fold on the flop using the same assumptions you are using. I don't see a set of assumptions where folding river is +EV but folding the turn isn't more +EV.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?