Well the bb has way more 4x and flushes so my intuitive reaction is to simplify and check back with range on the turn. Actually very surprised to see that check is less than 30% of the time. My guess would have been that the solver would bet infrequently and large as IP repping mostly flushes and sometimes straights.
The only time you really check back with range IP is if your opponent is supposed to play leads and doesn't. However on cards like this that a scary and often give one or both players a very strong hand there is usually a lot more small betting than big polar betting.
im not sure if it was mentioned but the hand is at the 51:40 point in the video.
I meant to embed the video with the timestamp, but made a mistake. It has been fixed. Thank you.
I’ve yet to watch the entire duel. Stevie’s turn bet seems unintuitive to me. What did the solver think?
Kelvin’s reponse is accurate but I am curious why you found the bet unintuitive.
Well the bb has way more 4x and flushes so my intuitive reaction is to simplify and check back with range on the turn. Actually very surprised to see that check is less than 30% of the time. My guess would have been that the solver would bet infrequently and large as IP repping mostly flushes and sometimes straights.
The only time you really check back with range IP is if your opponent is supposed to play leads and doesn't. However on cards like this that a scary and often give one or both players a very strong hand there is usually a lot more small betting than big polar betting.
Solver is mixing here, 28% check, 66% b30, 6% b70. The RNG rolled a 47 so Stevie was correct to pick the b30 option.